www-infrastructure-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Nalley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-7655) Explore where there is a benefit to having SSL proxies cache content as well
Date Fri, 16 May 2014 20:00:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000226#comment-14000226

David Nalley commented on INFRA-7655:

So with regards to your proposal: no. (or at least not anytime soon) 
The infra budget is large enough without adding two additional bare metal hosts. 
Additionally - knowledge of ATS isn't ingrained within all of the contractors, meaning they'd
need to learn it. 
This isn't a commentary on the technology (I actually am a great admirer of ATS and am using
it elsewhere) as it is on the overhead of adopting new technology in light of our other challenges.

Moreover this ticket is explicitly about seeing if our existing SSL proxies can cache content;
and where it might make sense to do that. 

> Explore where there is a benefit to having SSL proxies cache content as well
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: INFRA-7655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7655
>             Project: Infrastructure
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Website
>            Reporter: David Nalley
>            Assignee: jan iversen
> We have a number of SSL proxies that front end a number of our web properties. Is it
worth having the SSL proxies also cache content? This might mitigate short term outages, or
allow faster response from overloaded services. 

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message