www-infrastructure-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Glavassevich (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (INFRA-5427) Remove ta@cnconsulting.com from j-users@xerces.apache.org
Date Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:54:11 GMT
Michael Glavassevich created INFRA-5427:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: Remove ta@cnconsulting.com from j-users@xerces.apache.org
                 Key: INFRA-5427
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5427
             Project: Infrastructure
          Issue Type: Task
      Security Level: public (Regular issues)
          Components: Mailing Lists
            Reporter: Michael Glavassevich


For every e-mail I've sent to j-users@xerces.apache.org in the last month I've received direct
replies from cnci@server61.integrityserver.net which SPAM my inbox. Here's one example from
today:

==========================

"The user ta@cnconsulting.com does not accept mail from your address.

The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below:

>From j-users-return-13863-ta=cnconsulting.com@xerces.apache.org Sun Oct 21 14:51:39 2012
Received: from hermes.apache.org ([140.211.11.3]:23306 helo=mail.apache.org)
		 by server61.integrityserver.net with smtp (Exim 4.80)
		 (envelope-from <j-users-return-13863-ta=cnconsulting.com@xerces.apache.org>)
		 id 1TQ0cd-0006nV-1t
		 for ta@cnconsulting.com; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:51:39 -0400
Received: (qmail 73236 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2012 18:51:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact j-users-help@xerces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk

...

X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server61.integrityserver.net",
has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Michael Glavassevich <mrglavas@ca.ibm.com> wrote on 21/10/2012
    02:43:49 PM: > > Or do I need to import the whole document rather than clone
    to completely > > "disconnect" it from the cached master DOM? If so, how
   much more > > overhead, if > > any, does importing entail than cloning? >
   > Cloning a Document node is the same as creating a new document and > (deep)
    importing all the immediate child of the other document. > Whether you're
    cloning or importing it's going to create new objects. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-7.3 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI       RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high
                             trust
                             [140.211.11.3 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-Spam-Flag: NO"

==========================

I assume other posters to the mailing list are receiving this too. Please remove ta@cnconsulting.com
from j-users@xerces.apache.org.

Thanks.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message