www-infrastructure-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Thomas (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (INFRA-2493) Wrong attachment referenced in comments
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:14:27 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Mark Thomas updated INFRA-2493:

    Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Bug)

Maybe... although I'm far from convinced it is worth the hassle - particularly since it adds
a burden on every future upgrade.

If someone feels like writing a patch then I think I'd prefer not creating the link if:
n < 10
n is not a valid attachment id for the current bug

Even then, the invasiveness of the patch would be a large factor in whether or not it was

> Wrong attachment referenced in comments
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: INFRA-2493
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2493
>             Project: Infrastructure
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: Bugzilla
>         Environment: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48650
>            Reporter: Sebb
> [This may be a Bugzilla bug, or it may be due to the local modifications, which is why
I am posting here first.]
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48650 has comments 6,7 & 8 which
reference attachments, however the attachment references are for completely different bugs.
> e.g. Comment 6 references:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
> Comment 7 references the correct attachment (24985), as well as:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message