www-infrastructure-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Greg Brown (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (INFRA-2364) Nexus access for Apache Pivot
Date Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:56:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792735#action_12792735

Greg Brown commented on INFRA-2364:

Hi Brian,

Thanks for looking into this. The bundles we generate do include a pom.xml file, but it looks
like the way we name the signatures for the POM might be different. The POM files from your
working example are:


whereas our bundle contained:

pom.xml.asc (vs. pivot-core-1.4.pom.asc)
pom.xml.sha1 (vs. pivot-core-1.4.pom.sha1)

Does that sound right? If so, do you recommend that we change the signature file names, or
would it be better to wait for your update? In other words, what will ultimately be considered
the "proper" naming convention for these files?


> Nexus access for Apache Pivot
> -----------------------------
>                 Key: INFRA-2364
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2364
>             Project: Infrastructure
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: Nexus
>            Reporter: Brian Fox
>            Assignee: Brian Fox
>         Attachments: pivot-bundles.zip

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message