www-infrastructure-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Greg Brown (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (INFRA-2364) Nexus access for Apache Pivot
Date Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:56:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792735#action_12792735
] 

Greg Brown commented on INFRA-2364:
-----------------------------------

Hi Brian,

Thanks for looking into this. The bundles we generate do include a pom.xml file, but it looks
like the way we name the signatures for the POM might be different. The POM files from your
working example are:

pom.xml
pivot-core-1.4.pom.asc
pivot-core-1.4.pom.sha1

whereas our bundle contained:

pom.xml
pom.xml.asc (vs. pivot-core-1.4.pom.asc)
pom.xml.sha1 (vs. pivot-core-1.4.pom.sha1)

Does that sound right? If so, do you recommend that we change the signature file names, or
would it be better to wait for your update? In other words, what will ultimately be considered
the "proper" naming convention for these files?

Thanks,
Greg



> Nexus access for Apache Pivot
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: INFRA-2364
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2364
>             Project: Infrastructure
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: Nexus
>            Reporter: Brian Fox
>            Assignee: Brian Fox
>         Attachments: pivot-bundles.zip
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message