Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83E5A17994 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29542 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2015 15:56:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 29403 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2015 15:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 29305 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2015 15:56:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:56:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.42] (HELO mail-oi0-f42.google.com) (209.85.218.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:55:51 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i138so1901909oig.1 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:55:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5lzOMaEMaES9UaX+zlZGnLuznvtyeXjZcPMIDaaRH94=; b=DQMMzILCZDKdZAwcET6Sj6VxnmNSRPMs0ZsURvysWSDJzVOAdcD7CGzXOXYX/tBtID fySFdPBx1ZbePXv3i/0M2d1CHr7qHXqlGB8wrhCxnoLyAlg1S+FaRNaUYEiDaUJZV6xm 2V2HBgoGN46ESzmDPBcJF5IpVmWd9PxbDkF81U7Jyg4xmCXhpDq1ZS6slnCDQF/CR3Rr wGSB1PEs3+G8KhUpXySf66KoEPzqbhEjpMQgXR39V1sRuj/OuQs+j7qysv2U01fqMtr7 sX6FuAgutnK3geq25lRq+XlWKRAvRCe3pNZTdanKel8vAzQeIJESn2NyUboGvtw3AmcN ryQQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.213.74 with SMTP id nq10mr19471770obc.65.1423065330908; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:55:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.14.83 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:55:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7FADC07F-086D-49D7-8631-9BA5BA368348@toolazydogs.com> References: <7FADC07F-086D-49D7-8631-9BA5BA368348@toolazydogs.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:55:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ASF git/GitHub guidelines From: Benson Margulies To: "infrastructure-dev@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No, and the entire point of the torrent of email is that there should not be one. Github is no different than any other puddle in which code can accumulate. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I neglected to keep pace with all the git/GitHub discussions as we were bringing git/GitHub on board. Is there an ASF git/GitHub guidelines document that details rules and best practices for using git/GitHub at ASF projects? > > > Regards, > Alan >