Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89DC7171FB for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31024 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 18:54:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 30551 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 18:54:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 29993 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2015 18:54:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 18:54:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 18:54:19 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hy10so9142680vcb.6; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:52:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8yVGS/DDN74Suy6w0eVN0RSzqTBQrhB6Y2GZCxbfoNw=; b=EZAfLDPNDuPbIIshAsFKnmT43RKX3Z7pQQLUdSe9+F4qo8+faKfFZDVH6hyyL0FFDi a1lS3weN/jShAmA3txYwLjNjLhg2yKhFMTXQ3JF11t6GyEODLjauPhLDEbbetIEOemLr sAwd+ahho7ODNjTNBrfYtDue8JhUSKF6CDVkA0MoPwRQfIeTIMjXvCR8zRT+z8MWZFn9 zQKmgQk0PyP9M9iC9NUq+L0ga+Qw2SQVCW307y+NtEOr4kJAeWdx+miUEg3DCKWIRh0D VtuOg7BJ3TdzNMTTkcVjNWlMhf0IpNP0J2Rl84Mnok2fT6shf/mjC5kKp8Tq5XefF0Mz ODjQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.119.80 with SMTP id y16mr62549903vcq.51.1420570367440; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:52:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.36.174 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:52:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:52:47 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The 'infrastructure-puppet' git repo has moved From: sebb To: "infrastructure-dev@apache.org" Cc: Apache Infrastructure Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6 January 2015 at 18:49, Tony Stevenson wrote: > Honestly, I dont know. But we do aim to canonicalise all URIs to > git.a.o in the coming weeks or months. I do not want to have to map > all the old URLs etc to new ones. But if we must, we must. > > Right now we cannot do it, until we deprecate git-wip-us.a.o anyway. You could perhaps at least leave a README file in the old location. When SVN trees are moved, it's easy enough to include a redirect. > > On 6 January 2015 at 18:45, sebb wrote: >> On 6 January 2015 at 18:33, Tony Stevenson wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> The infrastructure-puppet git repository has been moved. This is part >>> of a several on-going strands of work: >>> >>> - As part of the infrastructure team's plan to consolidate our git >>> service into a single namespace. >>> - Migrate all services off hosts that would ideally be deprecated and >>> decommissioned. >>> - Have the service setup and managed by puppet (yes we are somewhat >>> aware of the self referencing nature of this repo). >>> >>> The repository can now be found here: >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure-puppet.git >>> >>> This is not the final URL, as ultimately all repositories will ideally >>> live at git.apache.org, in read/write mode. >>> >>> The infrastructure-puppet repo is the first to move from 'git-wip-us' >>> to 'git1-us-west' If this is successful the remaining repositories >>> will also move in the coming week (an announcement about downtime will >>> also sent in due course). We are using the infra team as guniea pigs >>> for this new instance to try and make sure we catch any issues before >>> opening the service up to all TLPs. >>> >>> There should be no material difference in the service. Except to note >>> that currently the service is a little quicker using the gitweb UI, >>> and seems quicker for normal git operations. But this is clearly >>> without load. >>> >>> If you have any questions please ask infrastructure@ >>> >> >> Are there any plans to introduce redirects for the old URLs? >> >> Without redirects, the historic commit mails are very hard to use. >> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Tony >>> >>> On behalf of the Apache Infrastructure Team >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> Tony Stevenson >>> >>> tony@pc-tony.com >>> pctony@apache.org >>> >>> http://www.pc-tony.com >>> >>> GPG - 1024D/51047D66 >>> ---------------------------------- > > > > -- > Cheers, > Tony > > ---------------------------------- > Tony Stevenson > > tony@pc-tony.com > pctony@apache.org > > http://www.pc-tony.com > > GPG - 1024D/51047D66 > ----------------------------------