www-infrastructure-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
Subject Re: Brooklyn not in http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html
Date Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:04:44 GMT
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:56 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com <mailto:list@toolazydogs.com>>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:31 AM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 20 January 2015 at 20:22, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com <mailto:list@toolazydogs.com>>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:19 AM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20 January 2015 at 20:12, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:08 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20 January 2015 at 18:12, Alan D. Cabrera <adc@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there a reason it needs to be added?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That seems like an odd question and I would turn it around
and ask, is
>>>>>>> there a reason why it shouldn’t?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IIRC that page is derived from the authorization
file for SVN -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn doesn't use svn, so no listing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It does not *need* an entry in asf-auth, but one can be provided.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Time to fix the tooling… :)  Where’s the code that
generates those
>>>>>>> pages?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The tooling is not broken.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is currently no readily accessible data defining the
members of
>>>>>>>> the Brooklyn podling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once a podling graduates, it will have an LDAP group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then what about all the other podlings that are on this page?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Documentation for podlings says you should update that file, so I
did it
>>>>>> for corinthia even though we use git, and it worked nicely.
>>>>>
>>>>> What file are you speaking of?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> this one
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template>
>>>>
>>>> Search for "bookkeeper=breed"
>>>>
>>>> You need to add brooklyn after that line. Commit the file and the rest
>>>> happens automatically within 24 hours (people.a.o is updated with a cron
>>>> job).
>>>
>>> Is there a corresponding authorization file for git?
>>>
>>
>> No
>> Git authorization is much more coarse.
>> tl;dr - we parse the name of the repo before the first delimiter and
>> look for a PMC in LDAP by that name and see if the committer is a
>> member of that LDAP group.
>
> By PMC I think you mean project, correct?  But I’m not sure if podlings are in LDAP.
>

No.
I meant PMC
Podlings are not projects in the top level sense, and have no entry in LDAP.

--David

Mime
View raw message