www-infrastructure-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jan i <j...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Brooklyn not in http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html
Date Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:19:59 GMT
On 20 January 2015 at 20:12, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:

>
> > On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:08 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 20 January 2015 at 18:12, Alan D. Cabrera <adc@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is there a reason it needs to be added?
> >>
> >> That seems like an odd question and I would turn it around and ask, is
> there a reason why it shouldn’t?
> >>
> >>> IIRC that page is derived from the authorization file for SVN -
> >
> > Yes
> >
> >>> Brooklyn doesn't use svn, so no listing.
> >
> > It does not *need* an entry in asf-auth, but one can be provided.
> >
> >> Time to fix the tooling… :)  Where’s the code that generates those
> pages?
> >
> > The tooling is not broken.
> >
> > There is currently no readily accessible data defining the members of
> > the Brooklyn podling.
> >
> > Once a podling graduates, it will have an LDAP group.
>
> Then what about all the other podlings that are on this page?
>

Documentation for podlings says you should update that file, so I did it
for corinthia even though we use git, and it worked nicely.

I really do not care whether I have to update the svn authz file or another
file, and we need to keep the information somewhere.

rgds
jan I.

>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message