Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA7D111D12 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75428 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2014 18:49:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 75295 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2014 18:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 75284 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2014 18:49:34 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:49:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-lb0-f179.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username jani, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:49:33 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u10so2175997lbd.24 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:49:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.63.162 with SMTP id h2mr2549053lbs.45.1402771772059; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.204.40 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:49:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:49:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Infrastructure at ASF is built from scratch From: jan i To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org, adc@toolazydogs.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133d3fe2cb6f204fbd041b3 --001a1133d3fe2cb6f204fbd041b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 14 June 2014 19:18, Alan Cabrera wrote: > I've been told that we build our own software across the board, right down > to the kernel. > I am not sure from where you have this information. I have over the last year commissioned around 20 vms, all ubuntu standard. We are in general trying only to use packages included in standard distributions (ubuntu, freeebsd and centos). That being said a number of our servers run with a "home built" httpd, simply to test the newest features (distros are often old releases), and our sshd on the vm is also special (but merely because the standard does not offer the ldap integration we want). Our core services is a little bit different, there we more often need to built packages. We do however not have a special infra kerne. > > This strikes me as excessive so there must be some reason for doing things > this way that I do not understand. Can someone explain it to me? > I think you have been misinformed. But do feel free to be bit more specific. rgds jan I. > > > Regards, > Alan > > --001a1133d3fe2cb6f204fbd041b3--