Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <51C2A373.6010009@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:38:43 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_St=E4rk?= <uli@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org
CC: Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jarcec@apache.org>, jeremy@thomersonfamily.com
Subject: Re: Atlasssian Stash at the ASF?
References: 
 <CAJg1wMSaBYJdbVex8xGrOsmoM2o297Jchx62XyoP-sVc_O1HFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130618203313.GE48975@pctony-mbp.mac>
 <CAJg1wMR1NMGJ5ghXG+uj+89+f8nNyk2Me3CcEaiJxKM4hKeiWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BF8F034B-C793-4BC0-9488-44982E90000D@pc-tony.com>
 <CADVmKVDT4gqgHCRO=8U1Mp8kHMHnMVUQ-visM4ZmZGyf6p7t+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJg1wMQT0HsRT6MXuNw_XYPwXrccJgM5zJUFgJEK_QqHtZg8rA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130619195722.GB23601@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20130619195722.GB23601@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

And hand over control over our code to some third party?

On 19.06.2013 21:57, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> A bit unrelated, more philosophical question - if the goal here is to have github-like 
> functionality at ASF, wouldn't it be simpler to use the github [1] itself?
> 
> Jarcec
> 
> Links: 1: https://enterprise.github.com/
> 
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:27:17PM -0700, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
>> The current method of taking pull requests from GitHub is very manual and will always be 
>> (since ASF projects aren't hosted on GitHub). Stash would essentially bring GitHub style 
>> methods of working to the ASF.
>> 
>> I'll comment on the JIRA issue more on why I think this is a good thing, there's many other 
>> useful features of Stash.
>> 
>> In regards to the FreeBSD issue, I'll followup with the Stash team to see what's up.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < jeremy@thomersonfamily.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Tony Stevenson <tony@pc-tony.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> The internal git solution is kind of bare bones and not widely adopted
>>>> yet.
>>>> 
>>>> Actually it is very popular indeed. A lot more than you might recognise. It also has 
>>>> integration with GitHub. So that hardly strikes me as bare bones.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'll add another reason not to use Stash: if we had it, then there are two ways to submit 
>>> pull requests.  It seems better to have one.  And Github is probably the better of the two 
>>> considering many developers who are submitting pull requests may already have a GH account 
>>> and not want to create a Stash account or manage their pull requests on YAVCS (yet another
>>>  version control site).
>>> 
>>> Jeremy
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- Cheers,
>> 
>> Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 512 961 6719