Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D90A0CE89 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85909 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 10:48:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 84381 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 10:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 82863 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2012 10:48:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:48:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.25] (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:48:03 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A47720A84; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:47:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Jun 2012 06:47:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=+eMPR6wLIz7GMEOOsHc6q4qNsa8=; b=TN6iU r2IXPSbB7LZ4dCnsu33O/1vQWEkz/4uiRCH7dlaXji6yjsRgm+6TQx9JTD6lQaqZ qROHHwRY8JcoEr0OYetOp1q9XnfKC7F22DP33w7LYwxzTrAD9Y9NFJOkPDtW1ic0 2MZyNXuSuA5hsf97//2Jkx8rzLFLUPIXjL0Vi0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=+eMPR6wLIz7GMEOOsHc6q4qNsa8=; b=TDmZ 1hohZAl2iX9PN6xMGPK3x1+lSJgIbIcApXQh5TV1mR0zYcFFX026QOmedVAH1YNO DvWmKAZRR24TQw3xakdZErYvcIRAk1ii5bMN6VNber4ITalxDX8WL+b23xnGE/ET 7/WvytmugJG9WrdA5QZF3xXQDYTT2YuHCB5+7wI= X-Sasl-enc: Jo58k8DERtXMTvVI0bKCE52obX10aP2qMjMMshcMgCD1 1338979662 Received: from tarsus.local2 (unknown [192.114.23.210]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 662FD8E0204; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:47:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:47:25 +0300 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Joe Schaefer Cc: "rubys@apache.org" , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Subject: Re: [2/2] git commit: 8817b8b - site/htdocs/index.html Message-ID: <20120606104725.GA5686@tarsus.local2> References: <20120605180145.79674FFEA@tyr.zones.apache.org> <20120605195107.GI3531@lp-shahaf.local> <1338934958.59763.YahooMailNeo@web160901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1338934958.59763.YahooMailNeo@web160901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [switching list with joe's ok] I don't know the git http protocol well enough. So you're saying that pushes can be made to always happen on the .us mirror first by standard mod_proxy application? And for pulls (.us -> .eu), I would prefer they happen even if no one pulls from .eu (think projects with large committership entirely in .us). Joe Schaefer wrote on Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 15:22:38 -0700: > If we need to geo-ns distribute our git service > across the two hosts, we simply need to write > a little "filter" httpd module that will trigger a > git pull operation based on the request url. > > Combining that with a standardproxy setup for > push operations will suffice. > > No we haven't done this yet, because so far we > haven't needed it- it's just a performance enhancement. > But it won't be hard for us to add it if we need to. > > > > > How do you intend to consolidate the git services on _both_ of those > > hosts?� I am not aware that we have any support for US->EU replication > > in git-wip-us.