Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00200C5BD for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 11:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75121 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2012 11:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 75010 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2012 11:40:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 74989 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2012 11:40:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 11:40:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.182] (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 11:40:32 +0000 Received: by wibhm6 with SMTP id hm6so4493342wib.5 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:40:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GiWrJQQWDoMlVWcrAVVw1l00qNmzD81utS7WPpf0fKE=; b=QOdLX6ayenHlyfG0ZoSSPnDlrLMZXebnl2Lq/oyMYmQi2sfkk9mkb3302Ae755Iuur 8+mpb2bNziIfHNsxCpNmGxRSvVPEb5fVYcDV+xqHeENACPm0ZLlg03wCKnhGTfAx0oUU av0TVRLChBtaiPCSKW5dh2M71dIqbP+SxuEwuJjd5y+H8mTxU+yzQmxfGvoY5N+vqXBG U+K05uGx/2sTkNEwgjZeSRCv9Os/ZkNjqHrkIEpqgvzWuBrwZjMq1LTp4hltK7kIVh5U 45eoiAxRigWv+SPtGDCJTebPzz6RSgQtmW9YqgHutQiNVSPAyyHE9BTwy2LtABVyMkkB DVsA== Received: by 10.216.228.224 with SMTP id f74mr3280018weq.217.1337859610560; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:40:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jukka.zitting@gmail.com Received: by 10.180.85.167 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:39:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120524081221.5B18517A2E@tyr.zones.apache.org> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:39:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MdTD-oIA2tUbMGOSzYolLs0IPt8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: subversion pull request: port to new style classes - http://stackoverflow.c... To: Greg Stein Cc: Git at Apache , infrastructure-dev@apache.org, davisp@apache.org, dev@subversion.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > The Subversion PMC does not seem to have access to manage our presence > on GitHub, yet people seem to believe it is a viable approach to send > us patches. At a minimum, the PMC needs a way to manage our presence > on GitHub: the description, the readme, pull requests, etc. We have quite a bit of control over that, though access to the github.com/apache settings is limited to just a few admins (currently me, Gavin and Tony). Do you already have specific changes that you'd like implemented? > I doubt that the PMC and community wants to shut this down, but *we* > are the ones to define our presence to the larger community. The > Subversion PMC is the group to manage pull requests, and other aspects > of our project. In short, this GitHub repository is representing > "Apache Subversion" without the PMC providing any actual oversight or > any mechanism to manage it. As mentioned by Daniel, the Git mirror was created as a response to http://markmail.org/message/gachaz3dcxukrpph. By default all git.apache.org mirrors also show up on github.com/apache, but we can change that per-project if needed. The GitHub pull request notification you saw on dev@subversion, is a result of our work to better integrate GitHub workflows with those at Apache. The idea here is to send the issue to dev@ from where the project community can deal with it in whichever way it prefers, for example by telling the contributor to use other channels, by filing a bug for the issue, or by simply directly applying the contributed patch. Currently the pull request notification doesn't come with a full diff, but we can add that if desired. > Please let us know our options for managing our GitHub presence. Just let us know what you want changed and we'll take care of it. BR, Jukka Zitting