Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7B7E9BF1 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63691 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2011 16:09:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 63527 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2011 16:09:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 63519 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2011 16:09:23 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:09:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-fx0-f50.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:09:23 +0000 Received: by faaq24 with SMTP id q24so1574112faa.23 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:09:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.18.233 with SMTP id z9mr6069455wid.0.1323878962030; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:09:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.27.67 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:09:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:09:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: @apache.org commit address requirement (Was: Git hosting is go) From: "Owen O'Malley" To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Instead of this %ce check I'd leave the commit messages as-is and > rather augment the ref-updates.log with information about who pushed > each individual commit. That gives us a more reliable record for tying > individual changes to ICLAs than the %ce addresses in commit messages. This sounds like the right approach. Making the committer be in *@apache.org is much too strict on the one hand and doesn't provide the desired property of knowing who actually did the push to the central repo. The record of who actually did the push to apache central repo is required I think. -- Owen