Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD61D94C9 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65994 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 01:28:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 65813 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 01:28:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 65805 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2011 01:28:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:28:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.178] (HELO mail-iy0-f178.google.com) (209.85.210.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:28:33 +0000 Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so12993459iag.23 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:28:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xvVWJ9XhvB1ibCRMvm5j+C3hkGuJGBkl2EAW+hhARzY=; b=SXvwwQdazp7JY8BK9Vc7r/OdkgFEZDNuy7S77XfTzrIV9eghoeInMJPQKs+0aga7lM aN+eJ2Gz2NnjwyNMfziVw8a9vrt8jcKTUFobXfFUiafpsjA8BcvkleDL5zRToN0AizdN uRNHemb+u99vQIXzh6Cf4BW/cCaH5pbjWyWyw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.207.72 with SMTP id lu8mr609184igc.0.1324430893490; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:28:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.94.198 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:28:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8FFCC1B8-280E-4003-90C2-24246AAA1EDD@gbiv.com> <3CDC4B29-BE30-45CE-A28A-22C171FC45CA@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:28:13 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8XUDgzcGxLnJexf8EWCkVIvL4DE Message-ID: Subject: Re: @apache.org commit address requirement (Was: Git hosting is go) From: Brian LeRoux To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FWIW, this is how the PhoneGap/Cordova project has always worked. We're very diligent about monitering the IP before drawing in new work. Only a few ppl actually perform merges and none happen w/o validation by at least two individuals (usually more). We coordinate via the mailing list. Seem to me this very compatible w/ the Apache Way but of course we are still learning. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jukka Zitting wr= ote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:03 AM, David Jencks wr= ote: >> I'm really not understanding what the point of doing anything other than= checking that >> the person who pushes the work into the asf repository is an asf committ= er on the >> project. =A0That's all we do for svn, right?=A0We can do reports or what= ever on the >> additional git metadata but until there's a demonstrated problem I don't= see why >> we need to solve it. > > +1 > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting