Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB6CF656A for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11706 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:52:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 11583 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:52:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 11574 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 07:52:00 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:52:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username elecharny, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:52:00 +0000 Message-ID: <4DF07B9E.9060308@apache.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:51:58 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org Organization: The Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Subject: Re: LDAP custom-asf schema - family name? References: <4DF07B0F.7070903@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DF07B0F.7070903@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 6/9/11 9:49 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > On 6/9/11 9:35 AM, sebb wrote: >> Tony wrote that he is working on the custom-asf schema currently. >> >> It would be very useful for generating sorted lists of names if LDAP >> contained each person's given name and family name - or at least the >> family name and the full name. >> >> Is that something that exists already, or is being considered? >> >> Also, there is a distinction between a person's full name (legal name) >> and their name as they wish it to be known publicly. These are not >> always the same. >> >> For the purposes of generating public output, of course the public >> name should always be used. >> >> This is not always directly related to the full name, so it implies >> that the family name should either be public or there need to be >> separate versions for the full and public versions. >> >> Note: where a family name has two words - e.g. Lewis Ship - this could >> perhaps be rendered in HTML output using an encoded space, e.g.  >> > In LDAP, we usually use those three existing AttributeType to store > such informations : > - cn (commonName) > - sn (surname) > - gn (givenName) > > The sn and gn AT are used to respectively store the name (Lécharny) > and the surname (Emmanuel). Ooops, surname (Lécharny) and givenname (Emmanuel) -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com