Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20770 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13772 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 09:59:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 13623 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 09:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 13615 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 09:59:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:59:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.146.183.93] (HELO nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.146.183.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:59:40 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.180] by nm17.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Feb 2011 09:59:19 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.41] by tm11.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Feb 2011 09:59:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1026.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Feb 2011 09:59:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 766269.56561.bm@omp1026.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 79140 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Feb 2011 09:59:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1297331959; bh=NG834nM4DNZ8Ps43w+3ntliGXa9640eOGA6BO7t4xAg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JfyoT2ffN/yosz64Ie5s8J6yljUMtBMqD1evAEqUnFu82YM+rNoNJx7m6FPyBZlqufGa0Oz/bKanQvF+VCqTskwb6uyxtIjGgX/t9U4KaAIONiSI6GYbH57b0VEofM5S0h3E/8JTW61BC5aiRdZ8pUfQTI8mitZuKLGr7lrPsYg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Pe8b3N0YiCxkYnjLN7/Dd22YRw8W1dzQpuZA3D0vXTxfhtYn67OS+J4pCfcuUI5We3VB4Jdr3alZqNApJqidx0EfhDiLv+hylm9m62cDSPbXkBGUxfDQOMnZXJeToYUyTRqsGTuE+deqqsWcnG8zSDuvGAFGODNvotsB0bQ0PiY=; Message-ID: <610914.73203.qm@web27801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Wb_NtZAVM1m7oS9JFsFdEx2Ni38Guu5HVm.9sS6finBDDBu bgl9D.sqJGF7SdyZrfHPVvF96A8L1qT0IMFQLH_rJR9pnBgLIwA5jCSu.ZbJ tQJfOFUZFTKg_YdRyyurV71tf6aK_kNjlKr6pGR0eyztrTRVXFVcGIiJ019r uy5h4MV8f8tV4qTK_MipVEtgInRKgl5gJe5gvmsszsWbL7OqC6s8Xf2ueVqS EG.3ASXr75CKscmuMr2_CYqSbS2FShLnoJgSIQ0jZPSKFfPmJGYiEliRgD.l VF3a1Zho2GB1ts6YDoLVkb..QjKNu25RwVEP4s59fB2l9xeY- Received: from [128.130.32.90] by web27801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:59:19 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.108.291010 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:59:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Struberg Subject: Re: Blog post on Gerrit (GIT review tool) To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 I think gerrit would be a great addition in terms of being a channel for random contributors. We of course might have to tweak something for our Jira integration. But since each contribution has its unique sha-1, this shouldn't be too problematic. LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 2/10/11, Jukka Zitting wrote: > From: Jukka Zitting > Subject: Re: Blog post on Gerrit (GIT review tool) > To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org > Date: Thursday, February 10, 2011, 9:55 AM > Hi, > > [replying only on infra-dev@] > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Thomas Koch > wrote: > > How do you think in general about GIT for the ASF? It > puzzles me, that there > > doesn't seem to be much of an interest to get official > GIT repositories > > despite the pain of working with Subversion. The > discussion on infra@a.o is > > stale for more then 2 months now. > > Sorry about that. I've been busy writing a book and it > seems like the > read-write git effort started at ApacheCon has not picked > up speed. > I'm on target to finish writing the book at the end of this > month, and > I'm dying to get back to more actively drive the Git > efforts here. :-) > > I noticed your earlier Gerrit work and would like to see > some of that > being channeled back to our infra. I already have an > earlier > experimental Gerrit setup at http://git.apache.org/gerrit/ (see [1]), > but so far it never went anywhere due to lack of time. > Would you be > interested in becoming a co-admin of that setup? > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/24zkrctjzqf6t3ar > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >