Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77805 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 11:42:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 11:42:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 17124 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 11:42:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 16946 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 11:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 16938 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2010 11:42:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:42:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.146.183.193] (HELO nm19.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.146.183.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:41:59 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.208] by nm19.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Nov 2010 11:41:36 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.42] by tm1.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Nov 2010 11:41:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Nov 2010 11:41:36 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 811660.28285.bm@omp1027.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 28959 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Nov 2010 11:41:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1290944496; bh=OegHholXVIL7DxAQKCX/kcFXtXvoOmaJrXem4aqvxfQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UA6dcC10eBfVUDUlN1Uvv6OFcradfMXYsTaL4729oxDWk1RUGrVlZNO580H1lf3CMxwEGE9kE8dpEZP/PZruM12MX8Ibqca7TKYUX5cq4X7wGs29jlqI7l8tu7G8Kr4IV0u+9Fhsrt4z1jQkk33fxixlR6Xpq/BdkKklq3fw7ZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sBAZydn+FI5hEJ/TeVrQMZVQ5HfbIb+9OJA9+5ShDM1bhBS62zmmMuSbmpfM1K7ZPmIztZqgEJ2nOYVA+cvO0FN4jFnFpwlP//fV7AH/bn0jzxk3XIMb+aEnMmpkEuwZMeLZmhN1XftWLEFt0sXEjhFXcVICrBaX1bPkM8Nv2s8=; Message-ID: <682174.28945.qm@web27805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 04Ndy54VM1kGUER6.4I.7zdJbEWNKm_QfLwGtZZeZvfnsz6 4QesvkCOHBtioByKv1elw6Uz1wSzQxykfJ2w49wg3HjaAih146PQdW0bMQ5P OwR6flcgaRi_a.xtXu5Mn8DUjcPBP7b6SCb3VoN_qNRo3_RYRa.Ks64Syp5E 0RdkfBBsHSV4knAUKR1pXUTRJK1rnEGCvoBbSGnNtzY03oD3_bXPSlr4aR9V CHOe6B.SKebVoJkji9fwYWEU0z5N903twrN7oOI2hw6vsh6EXAJCh4orW.I_ yIXXgyNIisX97tuQp4NWIczZEXNkyRQ53SetUNaYsZHd9nY6k7ZX2iuYjDry cUhxRC9LoQSHTp5etGQ-- Received: from [188.21.224.246] by web27805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:41:36 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:41:36 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Struberg Subject: Re: Gerrit over gitolite? was: Git Tasks To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org, thomas@koch.ro, Paul Davis , Paul Querna , Jukka Zitting In-Reply-To: <201011280859.30889.thomas@koch.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii As an old git guy, I'd also suggest to use gerrit over gitolite. pro: better tested, more functionality con: uses jgit (pure java impl of git) which is always a tick behind the nativ impl. But all the basic things work really well. LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 11/28/10, Thomas Koch wrote: > From: Thomas Koch > Subject: Gerrit over gitolite? was: Git Tasks > To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org, "Paul Davis" , "Paul Querna" , "Jukka Zitting" > Date: Sunday, November 28, 2010, 7:59 AM > Paul Davis: > > I can start by trying to get some of these tasks > working locally, but > > is there a place I should be working on ASF servers as > I go through > > these tasks? The bits dealing with Gitolite might be > better with a > > public instance to work with. > Hi, > > the messages about GIT on this list gave me the impression, > that official > apache people would start working on it so that I as an > outsider wouldn't need > to worry about it. - This was a misunderstanding on my > side, I assume. > > I started to learn Gerrit and wrote a message proposing > it[1]. However nobody > responded to it. > > I'd strongly suggest evaluating gerrit before too much > effort is spend with > gitolite. AFAIK gitolite does support only the most basic > needs of the ASF > while gerrit may be a turn-key ready solution. > > I offered my help in the mentioned email, but I hesitated > to continue working > on the task without any answer. > > [1] 11/4 "Use Gerrit? was: Full support for Git at Apache, > a dangerously > indigo plan." http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastructure- > dev/201011.mbox/%3C201011041001.45223.thomas@koch.ro%3E > > Best regards, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro >