Return-Path: 
 <infrastructure-dev-return-1479-apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 2478 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 10:59:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 10:59:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 49579 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 10:59:45 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 49375 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 10:59:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:infrastructure-dev-unsubscribe@apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:infrastructure-dev@apache.org>
List-Id: <infrastructure-dev.apache.org>
Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org
Received: (qmail 49139 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 10:59:41 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:59:41 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.francke@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.50 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.213.50] (HELO mail-yw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.213.50)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:59:34 +0000
Received: by ywi4 with SMTP id 4so1171711ywi.23
        for <infrastructure-dev@apache.org>;
 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=zZHKrvPTeJ6TnkhJk2fK67yvUsFrzQcLvPE53L4fbVQ=;
        b=dBD17LkBGQYqxQ/hvOtZH8f9eFpMA7pLAcN45CCr3NfrZQnTXOGhIPlCfy6iidez4E
         ShLTDynYVSmWCABq0hg/JnwBCyTbiZFQmpZlQFVRc3XbwuT+x4HW8JTLTG1qwwtGWxQu
         oYKdLh37zj4qBKS0dY9eNHKQSaUPyFiwN3bE0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=KnwLop8s0/m396P+80MRnDxhTxRPH+/JRkt0zk5Y56uc2vTMxoh/WngygCgu4Ca+4N
         yHVnOvAk7TGi1wHgBUmb2zN+VMB0lHnbgH6NgLgn+qcpfe5HyCfhrunhlJMNIfCXsZXr
         YVBNaREDJc+MB9LnSOPnHnx86H7SlFP1QnUxA=
Received: by 10.42.30.8 with SMTP id t8mr8157907icc.269.1288263553103; Thu, 28
 Oct 2010 03:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.192.68 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lars Francke <lars.francke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:58:32 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTiktoDyhUcShKObpT3wTXJZnoCqp8Y6i9w5e5Qhd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Current status of Sonar
To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi there,

I just wanted to know what the current status of a Apache Sonar
instance is. Thanks to the guys on IRC I learned that the Hudson
master is now on a dedicated machine and that Sonar could be installed
on that same machine which would hopefully solve the performance
problems that existed before with both of them living on different
servers/zones.

Any updates or open issues with this?

Thanks,
Lars