Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matthieu.riou@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.146.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=Abk+mCOItlBzPYfCIYh7Xh2Szip6DTGxTB+w2SzP52McMCC/9dvSXZilvyBUI+7/27/KEm9mazzyR8oTkNgu7J+0gprwK/NIFjkex3cUF+nSBQ+1LLkB4wAVPgCF/Faz4O3sxG2rHKalJ7mj37LCL/OEUT38SVl0uoCZ77IAskg=
Message-ID: <fbdc6a970805011105y3babde5em48e5c2a1615edab9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 11:05:45 -0700
From: "Matthieu Riou" <matthieu@offthelip.org>
Sender: matthieu.riou@gmail.com
To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org
Subject: Re: [dSCM] Use case: infra down for maintenance
In-Reply-To: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPEELAEDAD.noel@devtech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_16092_6009847.1209665145862"
References: <1209658387.5614.276.camel@marlow>
	 <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPEELAEDAD.noel@devtech.com>

------=_Part_16092_6009847.1209665145862
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Noel J. Bergman <noel@devtech.com> wrote:

> Santiago Gala wrote:
>
> > The recent days of hardware problems
>
> is not a justification for dSCM.  There have been how many outages since
> switching to SVN?  How many total between CVS and SVN over 8 years?
>
> And, as you note, this could be addressed "by having a copy of the
> repository with the whole history
> server temporarily from a different place (say p.a.o or a hosting place)",
> which is part of the plan.
>
> We do not want "peer to peer between developers" -- that is a violation of
> our development methodology, not a tool limitation.
>

I'm just curious about this last statement. Aren't we all supposed to do
peer-to-peer review of each others' patches? We tend to use Jira to share
patches but I'm missing the fundamental difference in the process.

Thanks,
Matthieu


>
>        --- Noel
>
>
>

------=_Part_16092_6009847.1209665145862--