Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 50997 invoked from network); 2 May 2008 10:26:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2008 10:26:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 59792 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2008 10:26:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 59746 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2008 10:26:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 59735 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2008 10:26:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 03:26:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hps@intermeta.de designates 194.77.152.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [194.77.152.163] (HELO mail.intermeta.de) (194.77.152.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 10:25:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (forge.intermeta.de [192.168.2.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.intermeta.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m42APjVC026953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 12:25:45 +0200 Subject: Re: [dSCM] Use case: infra down for maintenance From: Henning Schmiedehausen Reply-To: hps@intermeta.de To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org In-Reply-To: <1209715260.5614.368.camel@marlow> References: <1209658387.5614.276.camel@marlow> <07511532-8DC3-4DA5-9A2E-574BF96301D3@toolazydogs.com> <1209715260.5614.368.camel@marlow> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 12:25:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1209723944.9882.26.camel@forge.intermeta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-4.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.intermeta.de [192.168.2.3]); Fri, 02 May 2008 12:25:45 +0200 (CEST) X-INTERMETA-Spam-Score: (babsi.intermeta.de) -104.38 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 192.168.2.3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:00 +0200, Santiago Gala wrote: > > You mean it would slow our code evolution to a sluggish and confusing > state so that the ASF would die a horrible, slow, thermal death such as > the one the linux kernel seems to be enjoying since they adopted git? > No, exactly the opposite would happen. Because of different needs, pushes and working speeds, the projects would start to fragment. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/673386/ Linux is different, because it has something that we don't want to have: A benevolent dictator. Our development model enforces peers and wants to avoid project lead developers, so it seems that for us, a centralized development model is actually better suited because it allows everyone participating to keep up to date. Best regards Henning -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- hps@intermeta.de | JEE, Linux, Unix 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache Java Software Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350 Gesellschaftssitz: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen char name_buf[257]; /* max unix filename is 256, right? */