www-infrastructure-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthieu Riou" <matth...@offthelip.org>
Subject Re: [dSCM] Use case: infra down for maintenance
Date Thu, 01 May 2008 18:05:45 GMT
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Noel J. Bergman <noel@devtech.com> wrote:

> Santiago Gala wrote:
> > The recent days of hardware problems
> is not a justification for dSCM.  There have been how many outages since
> switching to SVN?  How many total between CVS and SVN over 8 years?
> And, as you note, this could be addressed "by having a copy of the
> repository with the whole history
> server temporarily from a different place (say p.a.o or a hosting place)",
> which is part of the plan.
> We do not want "peer to peer between developers" -- that is a violation of
> our development methodology, not a tool limitation.

I'm just curious about this last statement. Aren't we all supposed to do
peer-to-peer review of each others' patches? We tend to use Jira to share
patches but I'm missing the fundamental difference in the process.


>        --- Noel

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message