www-infrastructure-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <s.stri...@striker.nl>
Subject Re: [dSCM] Use case: infra down for maintenance
Date Thu, 01 May 2008 18:31:52 GMT
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Noel J. Bergman <noel@devtech.com> wrote:
>  > We do not want "peer to peer between developers" -- that is a violation of
>  > our development methodology, not a tool limitation.
>  >
>  I'm just curious about this last statement. Aren't we all supposed to do
>  peer-to-peer review of each others' patches? We tend to use Jira to share
>  patches but I'm missing the fundamental difference in the process.

There is a difference between peer-review, and doing development
helped by a dSCM which exchanges changesets between cooperating
peers.  We want everything to flow through the main repository, "forcing"
collaboration on one tree.



View raw message