Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 68918 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2008 09:37:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2008 09:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 96131 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2008 09:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-infrastructure-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 96065 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2008 09:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact infrastructure-dev-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list infrastructure-dev@apache.org Received: (qmail 96052 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2008 09:37:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:37:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:36:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E4B7AEF for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:36:26 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SF2vHH-4pPWv for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:36:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com (ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93CBBB7AF0 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:36:03 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1210152941.89849@n6nbG/3NAzllL7lXiMxeQw Received: from [16.25.171.118] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.171.118]) by ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m3U9Zebq022660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:35:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48183D6E.10709@apache.org> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:35:42 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Subject: Re: subversion user agents References: <48181B6D.3090506@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <48181B6D.3090506@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m3U9Zebq022660 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Paul Querna wrote: > figured some might be interested in this. > > hacked up a python script to read the access log on svn.a.o, makes this > little report of user agents.... > > I was mostly surprised that such a large volume is done by SVNKit. > > User Agents > 291892 Subversion > 214689 SVNKit > 26834 Browser > 8868 Java > 8516 JavaSVN > 1218 (other) > 1192 Commons-HttpClient > 718 TortoiseSVN > 523 CommitMonitor > 229 Nagios > 137 CIA The CI tools must be heavy hitters; they check on a regular frequency and put more load on our servers than local users, especially once individual developers bring up hudson under vmware to build/test their branch.