www-infrastructure-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Abele <e...@codefaktor.de>
Subject Re: [scm] Use case: code review/audit/study
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:46:11 GMT
On 12.03.2008, at 13:32, Erik Abele wrote:

> On 12.03.2008, at 09:40, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> ...
>> I've seen some grumbling about the initial svn load when new projects
>> are added to FishEye, but AFAIK once the initial import is done the
>> load on our Subversion server is not too bad.
>>
>> What would be the instructions from Infrastructure to an Apache
>> project that wants to add FishEye monitoring of their codebase? Is
>> that OK? Should they use http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/? Should
>> Infrastructure be notified? Are there special requirements for the
>> timing of the initial import or some other ways to reduce the load on
>> our Subversion server?
>
> The HttpComponents PMC recently asked FishEye to add the HC  
> codebase; ...

Ehh, I meant Cenqua of course...

Cheers,
Erik

Mime
View raw message