Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B5F5110E5 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42332 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2014 14:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 41999 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2014 14:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: community@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 41968 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2014 14:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.172] (HELO mail-vc0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:52:23 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hy10so7723659vcb.3 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:52:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4z0vImZPJD9f3+iKVdWyd0kWQ2QNvuiZOzZVY0e6A1A=; b=HFcwvBR4CVlX7WOl6qeC1ckpiyN5HyFf35/7TNmf7mr2RrX2o+tANHN217zsZdIQBs Mj9fQ0QauU4ckdMZwBZG1vd1e+eUI1v8lfCrAFcTIdnEPPjaR+JXV1maCGX1j2APBP6o dwzCvg3vKNFnnoaKr3DW1+69yagqJVbhW8THNaLDvzkQS5X0+1nqLrA+RN0oz4UgrB0c 2QsVGLpbbf9S5nMG5IfYVj+slH+c2C5M5nfm5qs3UU4LFJ/OSLPjJNCxP10CyzQ+6oox rzWGquxEjYTaTgRvnBEgsLx4vpsyZxgqzGrhC/8VtdGF2IiJZlCSJKhlLjtLYKZkhf5j g+NA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlReRKwsc/utTGZPCg1oC8weexpBoFJ7fVQHrtnhwZOIXvonnWxiWqX6p98fYzSt4ypwfM+ X-Received: by 10.58.198.67 with SMTP id ja3mr36150299vec.10.1404139922330; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:52:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.237.210 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:51:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Nalley Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:51:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Government License To: community@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That wouldn't be an open source license. Remember freedom #1 - free to be able to use in any manner for any purpose. That said there are actually a number of licenses that 'no evil' clauses in them; and IIRC there are licenses that forbid use by the US government; though a quick google failed me. But again, they aren't open source. --David On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:40 AM, McGovern, James w= rote: > Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the > Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want to > create a new encryption algorithm but for whatever reasons, don=E2=80=99t= want the > NSA to have access to it. > > http://facebook.com/McGovernForCT --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org