Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1487 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2010 13:29:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 13:29:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 82064 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 13:29:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 81634 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 13:29:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: community@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for community@apache.org Received: (qmail 22701 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2010 12:54:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.178 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PHX6k9PXBokZZY9n7jw6Xw2sVSOfx7vQCCX1CtBMYLQ=; b=B0GkfdUPCU6/6gtj/miaELlUDOml/vFtGSwrXyTY7uEwJ93ipx2QJwSo03/BqpxiO/ Ar1+mYkPC56Pq/xpqxcQkGmUiH1GDEPzJABW4xhMZYQ3Kw09tHlg7OGSK+Q16GUPbCpv C0zjsh3OtfiLngcx5v5Yq7cdBjAMCh7bqygoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CQL3i0NTf1LtseeZbLhFDLQ4zulmK9xAPM7wKsWeki4M3koLPcstwcuCY6xhLSS53F bBsmWDVewXFZ/fLyg2Bz7DdrdTDypTD0Si1VCycFZG6aNYWJHNUsiBlJsJhHMK5LF9UL F9lPsF19n/zpyGOL2IufIK+wc++aYkmnn37W8= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100913122129.63fea9f9@essen.neofonie.priv> <65FECC68-99A5-45CC-BE39-B0748D368027@pobox.com> <6DCD488E-7CC1-463C-9991-D09D2F7A246C@webweaving.org> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:54:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "Forking is a Feature" reactions? From: Jeff Trawick To: community@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175708d2b82c6b04904bd362 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175708d2b82c6b04904bd362 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Santiago Gala wrote: > BTW, on an unrelated subject: what was going on in the development of > the Apache httpd server the week before 2001-9-11, i.e. 2001-9-03 > through 10? Yes, I mean the week before 9/11 I'm doing some statistics > about OS projects, and this week is an outlier re: relation between > commits and list traffic for the httpd server. Any clue? > nada over Labor Day weekend then afterwards an uncommon amount of naval gazing around the 2.0/STATUS file as well as a surprising-in-hindsight concentration of core devs on httpd 1.3 (haven't looked at dev@, just http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-cvs/200109.mbox/date) --0015175708d2b82c6b04904bd362 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Santiago Gala <= span dir=3D"ltr"><santiago.ga= la@gmail.com> wrote:
BTW, on an unrelated subject: what was going on in the de= velopment of
the Apache httpd server the week before 2001-9-11, i.e. 2001-9-03
through 10? Yes, I mean the week before 9/11 I'm doing some statistics<= br> about OS projects, and this week is an outlier re: relation between
commits and list traffic for the httpd server. Any clue?

nada over Labor Day weekend=A0then afterwards an uncommon= amount of naval gazing around the 2.0/STATUS file as well as a surprising-= in-hindsight concentration of core devs on httpd 1.3


--0015175708d2b82c6b04904bd362--