Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81899 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 09:36:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 09:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 20758 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2004 09:35:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 20584 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2004 09:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 20504 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2004 09:35:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [202.187.40.2] (HELO f2.hedhman.org) (202.187.40.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 02:35:51 -0700 Received: from f2.hedhman.org (f2.hedhman.org [127.0.0.1]) by f2.hedhman.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9D9ZjiN019158 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:35:46 +0800 From: Niclas Hedhman Organization: Private To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: Open Source, Cold Shoulder (fwd) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:35:45 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20041008135458.R767@fez.hyperreal.org> <200410130121.21922.niclas@hedhman.org> <1097657067.27772.26.camel@forge.intermeta.de> In-Reply-To: <1097657067.27772.26.camel@forge.intermeta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410131735.45029.niclas@hedhman.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:44, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > In the end, the majority of the 99% must adjust to the 1% of idiots. Hmmm.... At a 2 magnitude superiority in manpower, the majority is unable to keep them in check, and weed them out? Is that a matter of lack of tools, or doesn't the majority care? You mention grafitti as an example; The punks can do it undetected + it is more effort to remove than put up. Would they bother if it is fixed by the press of a button, when 'anyone' sees it (i.e. good tools)? Well, maybe I am living in a dream world and there are more idiots out there than I think. Maybe you shouldn't tell me, I might get a trauma from getting out of my disillusion. > But please, stop talking about things that you obviously have never > tried out or at least not tried out on a marginally successful project. I am amazed at your logic :o), I truly am. But asking me to stop questioning the status quo, what is the purpose of that? Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.bali.ac / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org