Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3148 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 15:21:40 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 15:21:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 27018 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2004 15:21:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 26840 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2004 15:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 26818 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 15:21:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.qos.ch) (80.238.41.184) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 15:21:31 -0000 Received: from kal.qos.ch (kal [192.168.1.3]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F8F1EC1CA for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:28:23 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20040224161857.02ea2aa0@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: ceki@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:22:07 +0100 To: community@apache.org From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: Re: Violation of ASF license, how to resolve? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Living in Lausanne in the Canton of Vaud, I demand to be exempted from=20 paying taxes until they fix the problem. That is the least they could do.= :-) At 03:21 PM 2/24/2004 +0100, you wrote: >Hi all, > >I found out that my county is publicly distributing tax software which=20 >includes ASF software (FOP, xalan, xerces, logj4) but without including=20 >the required license. See http://www.vaudtax.vd.ch/ (but it's all in=20 >french obviously). As it's tax time around here, they already have=20 >distributed many copies. > >I have contacted them informally about it and promptly got a call from the= =20 >company who developed the software, the person with whom I talked says=20 >they recognize the problem and are willing to include the license in new=20 >releases of their software (notice in the about box + license.txt along=20 >the installed jar files). > >I cannot speak for the ASF on legal matters, but personally I don't think= =20 >legal action is appropriate as they have immediately reacted in the right= =20 >way, so in my view a "fair compensation" in terms of fixing the problem += =20 >public notices would be ok. > >In addition to fixing the problem in a new release of their software, my=20 >suggestion would be for them to include a visible notice on the main web=20 >page where the software is found, with a link to a page that explains the= =20 >situation (and apologies to the ASF?). > >WDYT? > >-- > Bertrand Delacretaz > independent consultant, Lausanne, Switzerland > http://cvs.apache.org/~bdelacretaz/ --=20 Ceki G=FClc=FC For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual" ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org