Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17790 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 15:33:48 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 15:33:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 58020 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2004 15:33:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 57842 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2004 15:33:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 57754 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 15:33:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail03.agrinet.ch) (81.221.250.52) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 15:33:38 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (81.6.43.56) by mail03.agrinet.ch (7.0.024) id 402AB4D70023249C for community@apache.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:33:39 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:33:32 +0100 From: Jeremias Maerki To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: Violation of ASF license, how to resolve? In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20040224161857.02ea2aa0@mail.qos.ch> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040224161857.02ea2aa0@mail.qos.ch> Message-Id: <20040224163059.14A0.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.07.04 [en] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Damn, we've got different software here in the Canton of Lucerne. ;-) On 24.02.2004 16:22:07 Ceki G=FClc=FC wrote: >=20 > Living in Lausanne in the Canton of Vaud, I demand to be exempted from=20 > paying taxes until they fix the problem. That is the least they could do.= :-) >=20 > At 03:21 PM 2/24/2004 +0100, you wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >I found out that my county is publicly distributing tax software which= =20 > >includes ASF software (FOP, xalan, xerces, logj4) but without including= =20 > >the required license. See http://www.vaudtax.vd.ch/ (but it's all in=20 > >french obviously). As it's tax time around here, they already have=20 > >distributed many copies. > > > >I have contacted them informally about it and promptly got a call from t= he=20 > >company who developed the software, the person with whom I talked says= =20 > >they recognize the problem and are willing to include the license in new= =20 > >releases of their software (notice in the about box + license.txt along= =20 > >the installed jar files). > > > >I cannot speak for the ASF on legal matters, but personally I don't thin= k=20 > >legal action is appropriate as they have immediately reacted in the righ= t=20 > >way, so in my view a "fair compensation" in terms of fixing the problem = +=20 > >public notices would be ok. > > > >In addition to fixing the problem in a new release of their software, my= =20 > >suggestion would be for them to include a visible notice on the main web= =20 > >page where the software is found, with a link to a page that explains th= e=20 > >situation (and apologies to the ASF?). > > > >WDYT? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org