Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89343 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2003 18:10:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2003 18:10:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 4190 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2003 18:07:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 3938 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2003 18:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 3858 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2003 18:07:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kosh.jetnet.co.uk) (62.172.71.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2003 18:07:38 -0000 Received: from goliath (host81-128-61-188.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.128.61.188]) by kosh.jetnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89B320A44 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:09:13 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <037f01c36cc6$2d379e50$7500a8c0@goliath> From: "David Reid" To: References: <1930000.1061917625@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <5.2.0.9.2.20030827113201.025ed718@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Subject: Re: EU Software Patents Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:08:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This particular line of reasoning doesn't sit very well with me. Bill, are you seriously saying that laws in the EU will not have any impact on the way the ASF carries on it's affairs? It saddens me as I thought we'd moved away from this sort of small minded view of the world :( david > At 12:44 PM 8/26/2003, Danny Angus wrote: > > >If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to opposing > >software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the demo. > > I will say that I'm pleased the members were able to turn the ship so quickly > to support the initiative, it shows exactly how far from lethargy our community > is, even near the end of summer. > > I should point out though that ASF support of the protest is a bit odd. > We are a US Delaware charitable corporation bound by (primarily) US law > and patents (and US patent treaty obligations.) > > When the topic of US patent reform comes up (the insanity that has led to > issues such as the .gif file format, SCO v.s. the world, etc) that we most > carefully consider a position and reflect that in our activites. There are very > stringent lobbing restrictions on the charitable corporation, but that does > not mean we cannot have any positions (consider the various cancer > foundations' support of anti-smoking efforts.) > > One thing I do not want from the foundation is a double standard applied > to our positions on US v.s. Euro patents. > > Bill > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org