Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 68253 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2003 16:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for community@apache.org Received: (qmail 96557 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2003 14:28:19 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20030406002403.030d1b98@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: mail.iinet.net.au:gstamp@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 00:26:28 +1000 To: community@apache.org From: Glen Stampoultzis Subject: Re: apache.org vs. mozilla.org In-Reply-To: <3E8ED6D8.8030607@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 11:15 PM 5/04/2003, you wrote: >Now, I'm asking: what if the ASF provides its own news server that wraps >around all our current mail lists setup and make them available to all >news-archiving services and news-reading clients? > >Of course, it should be transparent and allow to redirect back a >newsgroup post to the mail list, which will then be handled by the ezmlm >manager, like done today. > >So, you get the best of both worlds. > >I really think this is the only thing we can learn from the mozilla.org >community so far. But it might be a good thing. > >What do you think? If you still have access to the mailing lists it would be okay. One important point to consider is that not everyone can get access to newsgroups through their corporate firewall. Regards, Glen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org