Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 58800 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2003 08:41:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 58788 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 08:41:09 -0000 Received: from mta09.mail.au.uu.net (HELO mta09.mail.mel.aone.net.au) (203.2.192.90) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 08:41:09 -0000 Received: from cortexebusiness.com.au ([63.12.2.200]) by mta09.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20030205084110.OZQE27722.mta09.mail.mel.aone.net.au@cortexebusiness.com.au> for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:41:10 +1100 Message-ID: <3E40CE73.7020404@cortexebusiness.com.au> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 19:42:27 +1100 From: Conor MacNeill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en-au MIME-Version: 1.0 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: primary distribution location References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > The import statement alone is sufficient to make the source code a > work based on the Library, which means we could distribute under the > terms of section 6. Those terms are viral and disallow binary-only > releases, making our product viral because the Apache license does > not require redistribution of source with executables. > > In short, the answer is no, and this applies to any software with > copyright of The Apache Software Foundation. > Roy, Thanks for the clear statement. Conor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org