Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 65163 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2003 17:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 65109 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 17:22:20 -0000 Received: from www.jetnet.co.uk (62.172.71.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2003 17:22:20 -0000 Received: from goliath (host217-39-139-166.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.39.139.166]) by www.jetnet.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D211734FB for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:22:19 +0000 (GMT/BST) Message-ID: <012c01c2d384$575d20a0$7500a8c0@goliath> From: "David Reid" To: References: <004501c2d34b$94fb99c0$7500a8c0@goliath> <20030213034329.D57317@icarus.apache.org> <3E4BD155.1080104@hisitech.com> Subject: Re: Suggestion... Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:21:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > Perhaps, but I think we should make sure the "web page somewhere" part > > doesn't get lost here. Read or not, the email will get deleted or lost > > along the way. The web page provides a persistent location for this > > information for new and old committers alike. > > > > > > Anakia (jakarta-site2), or forrest, I think can use the same xdoc/source > document to generate the web page and the email text, thus making a well > managed source somewhere be the source of the *one time* mail and the > reference web page. See there we go again, retreating into our own little worlds :) The sort of information you refer to should be simple and should just be kept/updated/maintained once as it's essentially the same for every committer. That's what this email and the proposal I sent to infrastructure is meant to address. We need to stop thinking in terms of "this project has this" and start thinking in terms of "why doesn't the asf have this". I know it's a small change, but it's an important one if the community feelings we want to grow are ever going to have a chance. Also, we're taling about some simple stuff here, nothing that needs huge amounts of technology to get it running. Last time I looked email was still just simple, plain old text... david --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org