Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 71539 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2003 18:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: community@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 71517 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO appserv1.transolutions.net) (216.146.80.164) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Received: from tobrien ([192.168.1.244]) by appserv1.transolutions.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 35-65231U200L100S0V35) with ESMTP id net; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:39:14 -0600 From: tobrien@transolutions.net (O'brien, Tim) To: , "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" Subject: RE: [digester] site generated via Maven b8 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:40:05 -0600 Message-ID: <000001c2de8f$a86ef9d0$f401a8c0@tobrien> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: robert burrell donkin > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 10:22 PM, O'brien, Tim wrote: > > > Added Clover reports as well. Although, I can't figure out what it > > means that Digester has a 0.7% coverage. It is more than possible > > that I have configured something incorrectly here. > > > > I'm assuming that all ASF projects have permission to use > Clover based > > on Maven and Tapestry use, if this isn't the case, let me know. > > that's possible a dangerous assumption to make :) Agreed. I take full responsibility here. Apologies all around. > > on the clover web site, it says that free licenses are > available for open > source projects on application. i seem to remember talk about > clover being > made available for free for all apache projects but i don't > know whether > the ASF as a body possesses such a license or whether > individual projects > and sub-projects have applied for them separately. This is an important question to answer. It also might bring up some important discussions relating to ASF future use of tools that have restrictive licenses. > i'm going to comment out the clover line until we can get > some kind of > official confirmation from the ASF one way or another. I commented out Clover report from the temporary project site as well. - Tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org