Return-Path: <striker@apache.org>
Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org
Received: (qmail 17169 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 07:51:15 -0000
Received: from striker.xs4all.nl (213.84.19.217)
  by 208.185.179.12.available.above.net with SMTP; 24 Jan 2003 07:51:15 -0000
Received: from cheetah (cheetah.striker.nl [192.168.0.10])
	by striker.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 19400658F9; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:51:26 +0100 (CET)
From: "Sander Striker" <striker@apache.org>
To: <community@apache.org>
Cc: <acoliver@apache.org>
Subject: RE: Weblogs and Obstructionism WAS: Re: weblogs on apache.org
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:51:25 +0100
Message-ID: <JLEGKKNELMHCJPNMOKHOCEJOIDAA.striker@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPKEHOPLAA.noel@devtech.com>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

[CC'd Andy]

Noel,

Andy unsubbed (or at least announced he would) from this list some time ago.
I don't know if he resubbed, so if you directing comments directly at him,
CC him.

Sander


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:58 AM
> To: community@apache.org
> Subject: RE: Weblogs and Obstructionism WAS: Re: weblogs on apache.org
> 
> 
> [Moved from infrastructure@ at DWvG's suggestion]
> 
> > I continue to feel a bit disenchanted with the group of folks "I don't
> > see need for this, -1" for various efforts, where non-participation
> > would be the most appropriate (IMHO) avenue of "protest".
> 
> Excuse me, Andrew, but you *are* aware that except for a technical issue
> a -1 is non-binding, right?  People are just casting their votes for or
> against.  What is the problem with someone saying that they disagree with
> your view?  Why is that obstructionist?  This is a Community.  If the
> majority disagrees with you, is that obstructionist?
> 
> You did a good job of getting a wiki going here, so you can hardly argue
> that everyone is trying to preserve the status quo.  But the issue of blogs
> and personal pages has come up multiple times in the few months that I have
> had Committer status, so I am sure that you have seen the arguments before
> now.
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org
>