Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 56727 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 06:12:16 -0000 Received: from cancer.ucf.ics.uci.edu (HELO cancer.clove.org) (128.195.23.11) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 06:12:16 -0000 Received: from clove.org (c-24-130-187-233.we.client2.attbi.com [24.130.187.233]) (authenticated) by cancer.clove.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0T6CQs12780; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:12:26 -0800 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:11:27 -0800 Subject: Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list ( was RE: infrastructure@ missing from eyebrowse ) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: community@apache.org To: members@apache.org From: Aaron Bannert In-Reply-To: <3E368E6E.40203@apache.org> Message-Id: <8019F32C-3350-11D7-B442-000393B3C494@clove.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Too bad, the community@ list advocated it and should therefore maintain it. You're welcome to call a vote to invite him (here's my +1) -aaron On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 06:06 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well. > He's not a committer. > > Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >> Folks, >>> Open & Closedness of the ASF >> This is a very useful and valuable discussion - but this is not the >> right >> place. I'd really encourage you folks to pick up the thread again on >> community@ - which is exactly for this type of dilemma's and ethics. >> I'll >> promise I'll add a few words of my own when it pops up there. >> But for this list it is out of scope. >> Thanks, >> Dw > >