Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for community@apache.org Received: (qmail 99365 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 22:08:49 -0000 Received: from smaug.dreamhost.com (66.33.209.15) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 22:08:49 -0000 Received: from [10.21.30.69] (unknown [64.30.49.15]) by smaug.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA185B786 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:08:55 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: fyi wiki statistics From: James Taylor To: community@apache.org In-Reply-To: <3E1B4E47.7030704@apache.org> References: <99CB0D18-2260-11D7-83A7-003065CC5042@pobox.com> <20030107133719.A20672@lyra.org> <3E1B4E47.7030704@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1041977299.5469.12.camel@enki> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 07 Jan 2003 17:08:19 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > You are stating that: > > 0) download a working copy [this is done only once] > 1) go to a page > 2) edit it > 3) save it > 4) commit the page > > is comparably simple with > > 1) go to a page > 2) edit it > 3) save it > > and I disagree. If it means I can edit the page in my fancy editor of choice rather than a dumb web browser then it is much simpler. > The (only?) beauty of a wiki is its dead-simple editing cycle. I believe sub wiki also has a TTW editing interface. No reason you can't have both. Because it uses subversion to hold pages, the interface is nicely seperated from the data store. Sure, it is not ready for primetime, but I like the idea a lot.