Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: community@apache.org
From: tobrien@transolutions.net (O'brien, Tim)
To: <community@apache.org>
Subject: RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:14:00 -0600
Message-ID: <000001c2c98f$37a7df10$8435ae42@tobrien>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPKEAGPOAA.noel@devtech.com>

> > Oversight of content relating to a specific PMC should be the
repsonsibility
> > of said PMC.
>=20
> That is one view.  There may be others. =20

I understand, and I don't mean to silence discussion at all.  Just =
trying to
offer a very concrete proposal. =20

> > It is not clear that PMCs like [Web Service] have any Wiki content =
as=20
> > of yet.
>=20
> FWIW, they do.

Thank you, I stand corrected.  Let's consider HTTP and APR.

> > Therefore, I propose a hierarchy of Wikis.
>=20
> Actually, I think that the topology is better viewed as a (potentially
> heterogeneous) network of federated wikis rather than a=20
> hierarchy.  :-)

That also sounds very good, "The Apache Federation of Wikis".  Maybe we =
can
shorten that to "The Federation" - what's next uniforms :-)  You are =
right,
"hierarchy" makes it sound like one Wiki is better than another wiki.
Federation is more in tune with the concept of cooperation and
collaboration.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org