Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact community-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list community@apache.org Received: (qmail 59053 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 18:11:11 -0000 Received: from i.meepzor.com (HELO Boron.MeepZor.Com) (204.146.167.214) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 18:11:11 -0000 Received: from Golux.Com (dmz-firewall [206.199.198.4]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB2IB9s24054; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:11:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3DEBA251.F2E44F81@Golux.Com> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:11:29 -0500 From: Rodent of Unusual Size Organization: The Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: [proposal] creation of communitity.apache.org References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sander Striker wrote: > > My point is that quite a number of people won't have the time > (or inclination) to do so. And because they don't, they aren't > listed*. : > Currently the list (auto created) on Kens page holds about > 40 committers. How many committers do we have in total? > Somewhere between 550 and 600. 40 isn't exactly an accurate > representation of our community, is it? so the issue is painting the list as being representative, then? fine; we just mark it as 'asf people who have bothered to list pages here.' > I'm not. I'm just saying that on the members page _all_ members > are listed. what's the relevance? the members page says 'these are the members'. i don't recall seeing anyone say the list of ~name pages was to be labeled 'these are the asf committers'. quite otherwise, in fact; i've seen suggestions that it be clearly marked as incomplete and opt-in.