Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDDA200D23 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 01:29:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7CE97160BD7; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 23:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C0B761609DD for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 01:28:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 15178 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2017 23:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 15166 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2017 23:28:58 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 23:28:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 31A1D1A25E5 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 23:28:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.68 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.68 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_BADIPHTTP=2, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y8Es5jFS9Djd for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 23:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 767575FD33 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 23:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v62so12420536itd.0 for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Uqo5vs05kqvTmCl+W3gMcVpJtK24LovYQsCLeGhHxm0=; b=JO68LOfAG3xKRviOtIL1rjvGUwDhrQR7FxxykefiqRG8yro1iUIG6XgGuWvm67avqh H9jigrqovsmX/yA29rRDTIw4o3GbQf1ClpWlVCZVzdCZrUp4mF4yTGImLRQLBoQDc5Ip F/4Fa3sdQoT8KauauThfQGT3NlQuYBo5Wqp6IEJNrJpnBq7UHaGp1C3tyiZl1vz3JHn2 ivvQNbBqiG1g44j3UFymu1K27CMzt6Yw8++pcUw2j3PZn6dWocq2bh5R0/JMa5AaK14S auVqHCdmUNxDkHfazZZZm44s8o6mEm6DGusl5l22bYklRt4R+f6ja7Wnc2BBI+u+SOBK Ln3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Uqo5vs05kqvTmCl+W3gMcVpJtK24LovYQsCLeGhHxm0=; b=fDlXoH9nWDr6DYNn6YWu4wumvKywov+U0eC9CfbBo6Sq9HXppcZ9XN307Dv/iOrzHM HwvStS5YzxtzK8nIC+NHo9NM9n6QHMkxQrAY6u6X4CoH6o/PdRGG7x+pSJHPyndfxJKt N77tcdjX9LK4AcsSQOkqvkoIZQfGCZ93UsIqn/6f2yclvwffd4phA1TihM7ouilVvNS7 QUpF4oVS9nG9GF2kynbvH3Grd7TEG57xWJ0FlNcWtWU7IMzjxcBiAVqm8bgWLAT1d6rz 8jSS77TocoWF10EZDUY2WMflQYwYkwSITHbnQCeSmrCiRMbfJ5cZz6fmZoiN7BzxU+Rv 5Thw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjblNepWNJ4Y77vqTyKIwDhEP/TsKDWpi193xUM0xS15MCGxztV 6QoZf1UQrbSgItqhp3/tJ43feLlnE/fv9TjTWDFXdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCU+nPgjhuVe+K5oJOC+idJ6bCEADc6i3159BuEvAyfgDvXWy2IAnUG6K5HqZ60Re4nh1l/aYkx0fkXrto7eyw= X-Received: by 10.36.127.210 with SMTP id r201mr30887589itc.140.1507159734524; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:28:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.185.6 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.185.6 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:28:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <92BD06E7-42CD-4652-9B39-FB7EFB243859@16degrees.com.au> From: Greg Stein Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 18:28:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IP Addresses used by Apache Master to Connect to Slaves To: builds@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114742b098a265055ac0f818" archived-at: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 23:29:00 -0000 --001a114742b098a265055ac0f818 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Yup. That single IP is just fine. We just spun up the master at that address this summer, and have no plans to move it. Cheers, -g On Oct 4, 2017 18:01, "Meghna Baijal" wrote: > Thanks Gavin. > I was not sure if a single static IP is sufficient. > > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Gavin McDonald > wrote: > > > > > > On 5 Oct 2017, at 9:39 am, Meghna Baijal > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > We have a set of slaves on Apache Jenkins that run MXNet builds. I want > > to > > > restrict the IP addresses that can access these slaves on port 22 > > (ubuntu) > > > or port 3389 (windows). > > > *Question*: Where can I find a fixed and sufficient set of IPs that the > > > Apache master uses to connect to these slaves? > > > > PING jenkins-master.apache.org (62.210.60.235): 56 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 62.210.60.235: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=362.915 ms > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Meghna Baijal > > > > > --001a114742b098a265055ac0f818--