www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gav <ipv6g...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Please update your jenkins job configs ASAP
Date Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:43:21 GMT
fwiw I too had seen the 'disappearance'  of the 'slave' configuration of
the matrix jobs.
Nothing to do with what I have been working on, this stopped working a
while ago.

I have commented on a Jenkins jira ticket about it, no response so far.

Gav...


On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:

> I see.  I had assumed that setting the label expression constraint in the
> "advance project options" would take care of that but when I looked they do
> not.
>
> The problem actually was that they were using "slave" instead of "Label
> Expression".  After correcting that,  the matrix jobs seems to be building
> on the proper machines now.
>
> I've updated 0.98, 1.4 and master matrix jobs.  Hopefully this will get our
> jobs back in business.  Will check again later today.
>
> Jon.
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > without the configuration matrix item of where to run, we run on
> arbitrary
> > nodes rather than the H* nodes. That's fine if what we intend.
> Historically
> > the arbitrary nodes have not had enough resources to run our test suite.
> >
> >
> > (Also the image did not come through)
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I've fixed the matrix jobs for 0.98, 1.4, and trunk builds are
> fixed
> > > and running against appropriate JDKs now.
> > >
> > > The fix was to removed the "Slave" Configuration matrix item (that was
> > > configured in the advanced options), and only have the JDK
> configuration
> > > matrix items. I've set them up so the look like this now (image is from
> > > trunk [1])
> > >
> > > Jon.
> > >
> > > [1] [image: Inline image 1]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Looks like the matrix jobs -- trunk and 1.4 aren't actually running
> > >> anything as well as the updated 0.98 jobs.   This may have something
> to
> > do
> > >> with the JDK labels that were also updated recently[1].  Maybe this is
> > >> related to the "space in a matrix label name" problem that caused us
> to
> > >> change 1.2, and 1.3 into separate jobs?  (we have one good run in our
> > >> history of 0.98 using the now removed latest1.6, latest1.7 labels. [2]
> > >>
> > >> Jon
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/JDK+Instal
> > >> lation+Matrix
> > >> [2] https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-
> > >> 0.98-matrix/369/
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Michael Dürig <mduerig@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> On 15.11.16 5:05 , Ted Yu wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Looking at a reportedly successful build:
> > >>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.4/533/console
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I don't see the JDK 1.7 / 1.8 builds.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The build only took 2 min 44 sec ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> This is pretty much the same we are seeing with our jobs [1]. The UI
> > >>> doesn't show any configured nodes/labels, which I guess is why
> nothing
> > >>> runs. However it doesn't offer the option to assign nodes/labels
> > neither.
> > >>>
> > >>> Michael
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/zteyrxolwl46jcfh
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > >> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > >> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > > // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>



-- 
Gav...

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message