www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nick Dimiduk (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BUILDS-49) Surefire runner JVMs are being killed for HBase 0.98 Jenkins jobs
Date Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:38:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14593606#comment-14593606
] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on BUILDS-49:
------------------------------------

bq. if these builds were happening in parallel, could it be the post-build zombie finder matching
processes from other jobs?

Well that would be embarrassing. Sounds like an argument to experiment with isolation via
docker/LXC.

> Surefire runner JVMs are being killed for HBase 0.98 Jenkins jobs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BUILDS-49
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-49
>             Project: Infra Build Platform
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Jenkins
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Bayer
>
> Occasionally the JVMs executing forked runners from Surefire are being killed, failing
HBase-0.98 Jenkins jobs. 
> For example, see  https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/794:
> {noformat}
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.TestCellACLs
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.TestAccessController
> Killed
> Killed
> {noformat}
> or https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/797/
> {noformat}
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.snapshot.TestFlushSnapshotFromClient
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.snapshot.TestRestoreFlushSnapshotFromClient
> Killed
> Killed
> {noformat}
> Is there something we can do to avoid this?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message