Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C5C7175BC for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89966 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2015 17:03:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 89892 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2015 17:03:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 89881 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2015 17:03:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:03:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yzhang@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.179] (HELO mail-ob0-f179.google.com) (209.85.214.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:02:52 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wp4so32570285obc.10 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:00:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SaRioy8ooUEAmf/PO9HPRNpzqEgwtPE4bz2ebya1GUI=; b=HHD7QqYK5agjzfbgyejeR/FZJ4p7NculZjSITbPY+TylL7RG4yWspYNvOlk0ZCyyUo vST8/b6M6ikeLL7r9NUzqlD9wSV7SNSnEtTw79mwLuFG2StDBJ6aONkaDnueHvQg7cAX pEckTNwLmSeu1WU2qnSuULLEZctbzFRzXiA8CNFcPJNXZf0IuooGPqcWNOci5sWIqPun aCIZN2GK+r/4EGnWoVJSeh4zh8IqabEU2tcJfpzlhHCnIWDkkquq3o2jrjsovkcZ6PXj GhzwEuXTwrZsFXTL6l90as2cjUgeCy9E4gswhL3MJfvfSEiNVHCYaks286PkNTtwKXsN 3ctw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkr2XquVgdPkUnPg3Uqb2TKHU7Pu2VH3EfXlExttCm+sTZ3tFQvRpGtSIslU/YQ+iFz2kgi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.65.132 with SMTP id x4mr4944602obs.42.1424624435766; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:00:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.130.203 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:00:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:00:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: set up regular test of branch-2 From: Yongjun Zhang To: common-dev@apache.org, "builds@apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1be466ebc73050fb039c0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c1be466ebc73050fb039c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Currently there are no jenkins test jobs set up for branch-2, it seems reasonable to do so because of the difference between trunk and branch-2. I guess this might have been discussed before, but I would like to bring to your attention. I wonder if there is any concern not to have the branch-2 test (other than that it would consume more resources) . Thanks. --Yongjun --001a11c1be466ebc73050fb039c0--