Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F92610BB9 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62237 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2014 20:52:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62164 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2014 20:52:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 62143 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2014 20:52:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 20:52:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stevel@hortonworks.com designates 209.85.223.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.170] (HELO mail-ie0-f170.google.com) (209.85.223.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 20:52:17 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id rd18so3554421iec.1 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:51:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MYg/CkiIaZ3BU00zlYxc8qQ32nnH02no+MjnWnjwTkE=; b=XjJPV8ppkM3CzzFbRaYJWWdQziMuBPjN+skOz8x6pmYnH4oyiv+6g4p/04aG3RHy3U MN5EoavgioV9OaE+IkNfQ/dtc2M73VZ1yaV25ckbAH9njLA1SCkc+t7pf5m1CyhXl/Yt pHxMBh5FzHOBPQrIQtXFWmiffyEsf+CcJGrYr5QMabsHqqeRC4enMPKf4oEydpE4npxS 0b5tzyeDJ+7Lufgw4j2CAHmcRUK1qOfl8lMbWtzB0bPPuqOrbylrfIXqMjki8Lg+l8/Y Kt8kwDng3AkR4nJTRy2kIlcu2QSP++yEtGJHJ/16WkuFgjWpHNNhiY2eSCcS2QKNFBeA noIg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlj/OLcmMs5QCOwkv32uB7S4/IzCFOAZxVzBPCJbJKTz0TU5r0APnMU8LJ6yJHXz4q2AwK5K4TffGwHN2ovQnNQ+dQwRdinmPY4WiFroVQJU+rzsL8= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.133.17 with SMTP id h17mr7880215iod.47.1417985472048; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:51:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.31.137 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 12:51:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <398E1339-02A2-4A3D-BE81-49A95ED534C2@16degrees.com.au> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:51:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: latest java versions From: Steve Loughran To: builds@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ec2705bd1cf0509a678d9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a113ec2705bd1cf0509a678d9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7 December 2014 at 20:42, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Actually, it is by design - we'd like to avoid having to manually install > JVMs on every slave when possible. The auto-installing JDKs from the drop > down are the preferred way to handle this - if you need a new JDK added > there, open a BUILDS ticket. > > fine, but you aren't answer the question why does the link to "latest" not point to the latest JDK on the target machines. That's not a versioning problem, it's a path maintenance problem > A. > On Dec 7, 2014 10:09 AM, "Gavin McDonald" wrote: > > > > > On 07/12/2014, at 3:49 PM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > > > > > while dealing with some fun moving hadoop-patch-test Jenkins to java = 7, > > one > > > thing that I can see is that the symlinks of latests java versions > aren't > > > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 39 Oct 6 22:40 latest -> > > > /home/jenkins/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_45-64 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 13 Jul 23 2011 latest1.4 -> > > j2sdk1.4.2_19 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 Jul 23 2011 latest1.5 -> > > jdk1.5.0_22-32 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 Jul 23 2011 latest1.5-32 -> > > > jdk1.5.0_22-32 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 Jul 23 2011 latest1.5-64 -> > > > jdk1.5.0_22-64 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 May 14 2013 latest1.6 -> > > jdk1.6.0_45-32 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 May 14 2013 latest1.6-32 -> > > > jdk1.6.0_45-32 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 May 14 2013 latest1.6-64 -> > > > jdk1.6.0_45-64 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 Jul 31 2013 latest1.7 -> > > jdk1.7.0_25-32 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 Jul 31 2013 latest1.7-32 -> > > > jdk1.7.0_25-32 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 jenkins jenkins 14 Jul 31 2013 latest1.7-64 -> > > > jdk1.7.0_25-64 > > > > > > > > > With the actual versions installed: > > > > > > drwxr-xr-x 9 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.5.0_17-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 9 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.5.0_17-64 > > > drwxr-xr-x 9 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.5.0_22-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 9 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.5.0_22-64 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.6.0_11-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.6.0_11-64 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.6.0_20-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 > > > jdk1.6.0_20-32-unlimited-security > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jul 23 2011 jdk1.6.0_20-64 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Oct 16 2011 jdk1.6.0_27-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Oct 16 2011 jdk1.6.0_27-64 > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 jenkins jenkins 4096 Mar 26 2013 jdk1.6.0_45-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 jenkins jenkins 4096 Mar 26 2013 jdk1.6.0_45-64 > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 jenkins jenkins 4096 Oct 3 2012 jdk1.7.0_04 > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jun 6 2013 jdk1.7.0_25-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jun 6 2013 jdk1.7.0_25-64 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jun 27 2011 jdk1.7.0-32 > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 jenkins jenkins 4096 Mar 18 2014 jdk1.7.0_55 > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins 4096 Jun 27 2011 jdk1.7.0-64 > > > > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 jenkins jenkins 4096 Mar 4 2014 jdk1.8.0 > > > > > > > > > Are these latest/ links explicitly frozen, or simply have been > > > neglected for a while? > > > > > > > Neglected I would Imagine. They are different on many machines, and als= o > > the > > drop-down options in the master gui config don't match. > > > > As this is not a 5 minute fix, is it possible you can create a BUILDS > jira > > so someone > > can go through this ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Gav=E2=80=A6 > > > > > > > > -steve > > > > > > -- > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or > entity > > to > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidentia= l, > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the > reader > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notifie= d > > that > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > > immediately > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > > > > --=20 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to= =20 which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,=20 privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader= =20 of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that= =20 any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or=20 forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have=20 received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately= =20 and delete it from your system. Thank You. --001a113ec2705bd1cf0509a678d9--