www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: latest java versions
Date Sun, 07 Dec 2014 20:51:11 GMT
On 7 December 2014 at 20:42, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, it is by design - we'd like to avoid having to manually install
> JVMs on every slave when possible. The auto-installing JDKs from the drop
> down are the preferred way to handle this - if you need a new JDK added
> there, open a BUILDS ticket.
>
>
fine, but you aren't answer the question

why does the link to "latest" not point to the latest JDK on the target
machines.

That's not a versioning problem, it's a path maintenance problem


> A.
> On Dec 7, 2014 10:09 AM, "Gavin McDonald" <gavin@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 07/12/2014, at 3:49 PM, Steve Loughran <stevel@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > while dealing with some fun moving hadoop-patch-test Jenkins to java 7,
> > one
> > > thing that I can see is that the symlinks of latests java versions
> aren't
> > >
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        39 Oct  6 22:40 latest ->
> > > /home/jenkins/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_45-64
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        13 Jul 23  2011 latest1.4 ->
> > j2sdk1.4.2_19
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5 ->
> > jdk1.5.0_22-32
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5-32 ->
> > > jdk1.5.0_22-32
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5-64 ->
> > > jdk1.5.0_22-64
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6 ->
> > jdk1.6.0_45-32
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6-32 ->
> > > jdk1.6.0_45-32
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6-64 ->
> > > jdk1.6.0_45-64
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7 ->
> > jdk1.7.0_25-32
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7-32 ->
> > > jdk1.7.0_25-32
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7-64 ->
> > > jdk1.7.0_25-64
> > >
> > >
> > > With the actual versions installed:
> > >
> > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_17-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_17-64
> > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_22-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_22-64
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_11-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_11-64
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_20-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011
> > > jdk1.6.0_20-32-unlimited-security
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_20-64
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct 16  2011 jdk1.6.0_27-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct 16  2011 jdk1.6.0_27-64
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 26  2013 jdk1.6.0_45-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 26  2013 jdk1.6.0_45-64
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct  3  2012 jdk1.7.0_04
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun  6  2013 jdk1.7.0_25-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun  6  2013 jdk1.7.0_25-64
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun 27  2011 jdk1.7.0-32
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 18  2014 jdk1.7.0_55
> > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun 27  2011 jdk1.7.0-64
> > >
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar  4  2014 jdk1.8.0
> > >
> > >
> > > Are these latest/ links explicitly frozen, or simply have been
> > > neglected for a while?
> > >
> >
> > Neglected I would Imagine. They are different on many machines, and also
> > the
> > drop-down options in the master gui config don't match.
> >
> > As this is not a 5 minute fix, is it possible you can create a BUILDS
> jira
> > so someone
> > can go through this ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gav…
> >
> > >
> > > -steve
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
> >
>

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message