Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64944108B4 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38909 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2013 02:55:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 38662 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2013 02:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 38654 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2013 02:55:36 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:55:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-oa0-f54.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username olamy, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:55:35 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o6so1542730oag.41 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:55:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lvFccSO2trcvuJVfPU1M70URSeVY6Dmu40lxmWOgR4c=; b=E5dDtr5PZ2My3Ouoau13vsDlQ1LCnGW/BjxcAW6xloCCc1d5ZfCwT+M1nXCGkN1XtR YNtwU1JNzE1ICndT6K25HZR7VFysPgU5qSClpx7t497AGDxVyfDKFKD2y90Ui3qx0lrN qOkMJHHQ0pTyDleGka2Q9UokggA2uLffGVfzfSWVXljqw9bYjg1QOF30wzV2lmwe+z98 0iw5cT9AjMCI2j0kSPAk86Iv2VjDlQfEBxgZiPas5SMtieD9jPuAXs9vcSBO1qNwbiPD MPoafQpY5qFyF0WGFwY78w6oFY0uymefPplNArwabE2eJ8Ppw7RIrwotHaPrT3B8dIjM TCtA== X-Received: by 10.60.146.210 with SMTP id te18mr17082088oeb.20.1384397735058; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:55:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.132.68 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:55:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <036301cedf2c$aeaecf10$0c0c6d30$@apache.org> References: <1384184686.55642.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1384189963.518.YahooMailNeo@web28906.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <036301cedf2c$aeaecf10$0c0c6d30$@apache.org> From: Olivier Lamy Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:55:15 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JDK-8 developer preview for our Jenkins? To: "builds@apache.org" Cc: Mark Struberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Installed only for ubuntu-ARM nodes. You must choose "Open JDK 1.8 ..." Have Fun -- Olivier On 12 November 2013 09:23, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > Cool! Oracle asked yesterday if they should ask other ASF projects, too, = and they did :-) > > At the moment we are doing the Lucene/Solr tests in close cooperation wit= h Oracle (we had some phone conferences the last weeks about this). Unfortu= nately we cannot run this on the ASF Jenkins machine at the moment, because= we use some custom groovy scripts inside Jenkins to randomly choose a diff= erent JVM + full dynamic configuration (like garbage collector, bitness, co= mpressed oops, client/server VM, it=92s a large number of combinations poss= ible). By this we already found tons of bugs in Java 8, but also the reason= for the stability problems in Java 7u40 and u45, so Oracle is happy to wor= k together with the Lucene project. > > The Jenkins server running all these tests is available at: http://jenkin= s.thetaphi.de > Here is the talk about this setup: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/sites/berlin= buzzwords.de/files/slides/Schindler-BugsBugsBugs.pdf > This machine is running Linux (Ubuntu 12.04) with 2 VirtualBOX VMs runnin= g Windows 7 and MacOSX 10.8 (natively, non-patched/cracked, non-hackintosh = EFI64 setup) > > Unfortunately, without support for this special configuration through ASF= and/or additional hardware, I cannot provide this service to other project= s. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > uschindler@apache.org > Apache Lucene PMC Chair / Committer > Bremen, Germany > http://lucene.apache.org/ > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Struberg [mailto:struberg@yahoo.de] >> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 6:13 PM >> To: builds@apache.org >> Subject: Re: JDK-8 developer preview for our Jenkins? >> >> >> >> This is a chicken and egg problem. >> >> Dalibor Topic (one of the openjdk leads) asked me if we could do some >> testing with Java8 so they have better feedback about the maturity. >> He (and me as well) like to prevent such disasters like it happened with= the >> last java7 upgrade where a few core projects like lucene didn't work >> anymore. >> >> What is the problem with installing openjdk-8-preview as JDK on at least= our >> ubuntu boxes? >> It should of course clearly get marked as 'preview'. But I think it woul= d also be >> of great help for a few ASF projects to detect any limitations and probl= ems >> very early. >> If we don't detect them yet, then we probably have to deal with them in >> production later. >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> > From: Jake Farrell >> >To: "builds@apache.org" ; Mark Struberg >> >> >Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 18:01 >> >Subject: Re: JDK-8 developer preview for our Jenkins? >> > >> > >> > >> >For openjdk we currently only have in use the default packages provided >> from ubuntu, I would prefer not to install preview versions on the slave= s if >> possible. Is there an immediate need for this or can it wait till openjd= k-8 is >> GA? >> > >> > >> >-Jake >> > >> > >> > >> >On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Mark Struberg >> wrote: >> > >> >Hi folks! >> >> >> >>I'm interested in testing many of my projects with the JDK-8 developer >> preview. >> >>Is there an easy way to install openjdk8 on any of the jenkins boxes? >> >> >> >>txs and LieGrue, >> >>strub >> > >> > >> > > --=20 Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy