Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA06010B51 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40388 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 11:56:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 40344 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 11:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 40323 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2013 11:55:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:55:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.128.46] (HELO mail-qe0-f46.google.com) (209.85.128.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:55:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x7so5487049qeu.5 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:55:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=blibXGVn1FOz3g8mT0WH7if90TQOCeHh19XJNl756Wo=; b=ffk/X+s09f4q+fiOzMYLWZP6SCVH/qeMipVr8zdFXVBXuNJ7P5VjKzF5Ypu7xhjO6O DUTJq2PQVSIuqBylKvvmu2+5HLzwjqIJIkuDV3w/eBPDIi5tbtK942WS6YSeeELAj8sB +5CyAogQqMP+Dcb3OT2D/fXy9atpymHIWvfelzQa7W0BTvyJRYx6/kHyNibeF5Knr7uT jnN1usHQgdCnz/lzA4ayaVKqWHCPwsmkXS+BqYZgQxtnh8IB0Y4+bivDBzVz+Gl4ZQ3m B7ii9WW0n88+73IglouJ5b4nSjh3rut5SZ5Fus+L7NfeiC5GDCVXp26Xz69aoOuoF8sv 5krw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCp7Z0oJLFjU9C3wTOFKkAROAYZODTpPa4ZDsVOAwYzCfESQOfA5uhllFbnvQM4u7xAO25 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.116.229 with SMTP id jz5mr2426876qeb.87.1379591704898; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.128.39 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:55:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <026601ceb51d$69949fb0$3cbddf10$@16degrees.com.au> References: <025b01ceb50e$3b87d3d0$b2977b70$@16degrees.com.au> <026601ceb51d$69949fb0$3cbddf10$@16degrees.com.au> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:55:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [windows1] Oflline (again...) From: Niklas Gustavsson To: "builds@apache.org" , Gavin McDonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:erik@ixsoftware.nl] >> Sent: Thursday, 19 September 2013 6:16 PM >> To: builds@apache.org; Gavin McDonald >> Subject: Re: [windows1] Oflline (again...) >> >> Well, after my coffee sank in, I realised that was a bit harsh. Sorry. > > No problem. > >> >> But it's true nonetheless. We're all the volunteers, I get that. >> However, taking on a responsibility means that you take it seriously, >> especially if other volunteers rely on you. You explained there are at > least 9 >> people who can administer the 'windows1' node, so I don't think it's >> unreasonable to expect at least one of them monitors emails about - and > the >> status of - the node at least once a day. That's why I waited at least a > day to >> raise the alarm. > > I will be culling that list of 9, most are now doing other things, moved on > , which is fine. > > Myself, Niklas and Jake Farrell are probably the best bets for the Windows > boxes currently. > > One of us will take a look shortly Back up. /niklas