Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21123 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 13:34:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 13:34:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 95773 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 13:34:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 95711 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 13:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 95699 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 13:34:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:34:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.50] (HELO mail-yw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.213.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:34:02 +0000 Received: by ywa8 with SMTP id 8so448762ywa.23 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:33:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=25PLzbWmeFw9Miy+BfkUL/IPKkjxXgAvb8OcW0loGbU=; b=NBvhC3+ZAjeY1a2BEkdcsfw8hbi5y5W8ZXoSRoXuJ23pXylfyS1uGm4jCYQ+OLVXlP VBxQgDmqQHB/gr4PPN90NB2ZVYFoOXo608MclWKP7mBs0qELIllGvcDH0kLaE0ZxRb3S POG/1J6MC1DYTPFNSZD8i3qiGFr1WvSFcM1hY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kgR8LduYsfYlNWsEIhW7T8z5f/CO3NB9jsY+aYuiV1FF14HpV80vivQmxCkCo/MbN+ NjHAcBvuyGJEr79TWCEKmUVYczkFhjuPv31Z/rmAx8O5GV9s4aoGPgDMRhiLNAnTapv4 FhLhWGHc9ebdEn1I4921uVj3Nd3qmEybT73E8= Received: by 10.90.57.33 with SMTP id f33mr1847912aga.166.1299159221116; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:33:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.116.7 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 05:33:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D6F97D8.9090305@apache.org> References: <4D4922EA.1030504@apache.org> <-1276032854316273436@unknownmsgid> <4D496F90.8060400@apache.org> <4D49A7E3.2050002@gmail.com> <4D6F97D8.9090305@apache.org> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:33:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rsync daemon on hudson slave? To: builds@apache.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_St=E4rk?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Ulrich St=E4rk wrote: > The only thing that seems reasonable apart from having an rsync daemon is= doing a recursive wget on > the generated site every hour or so. This will however fetch all 4000 fil= es and I don't know how > much load it puts on Jenkins. Is this OK? Doesn't sound like a very good approach. The Apache CMS setup running on Buildbot simply commits the generated site to svn from where it's picked up by the public web servers. I guess a similar setup could be done also with Maven site builds running in Hudson. BR, Jukka Zitting