www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:33:08 GMT
Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they
didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name.

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it
> doesn't apply to subdomains.  I'm okay with migrating the domain name,
> but there should be a grace period.
>
> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for
> everyone who cares .. :)
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming
> the
> > name as a trademark.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apache@materne.de> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for Jenkins
> >> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
> >>
> >> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
> >>
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org]
> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
> >>> An: builds@apache.org
> >>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
> >>>
> >>> +1 for jenkins
> >>>
> >>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
> >>> which one I don't care that much.
> >>>
> >>> Nicolas
> >>>
> >>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for Jenkins.  +1 for a redirect.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nige
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
> >>> <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle
:
> >>> IMHO
> >>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins
has
> >>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves
not
> >>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have
with
> >>> our
> >>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone
> >>> objects, I
> >>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming
> >>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins
> >>> situation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> /niklas
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>>
> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message