www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:46:16 GMT
Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag
'trademark' into it.

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
> Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they
> didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name.
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it
>> doesn't apply to subdomains.  I'm okay with migrating the domain name,
>> but there should be a grace period.
>>
>> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for
>> everyone who cares .. :)
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming
>> the
>> > name as a trademark.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apache@materne.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 for Jenkins
>> >> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
>> >>
>> >> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org]
>> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
>> >>> An: builds@apache.org
>> >>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 for jenkins
>> >>>
>> >>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
>> >>> which one I don't care that much.
>> >>>
>> >>> Nicolas
>> >>>
>> >>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>>> +1 for Jenkins.  +1 for a redirect.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nige
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
>> >>> <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or
Oracle :
>> >>> IMHO
>> >>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins
has
>> >>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves
not
>> >>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have
with
>> >>> our
>> >>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone
>> >>> objects, I
>> >>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for
renaming
>> >>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins
>> >>> situation.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -Matthias
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> /niklas
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message